A practical selection guide for procurement teams, MRO managers, and project engineers

“Steel & stainless steel valves” is a broad buying category that spans municipal water, industrial process piping, and fire protection infrastructure. The right choice depends on far more than size and end connection—media compatibility, pressure class, code/standard requirements, maintenance access, and lead-time risk all matter. This guide breaks down how experienced U.S. buyers evaluate valve materials and specifications, with a checklist you can use to reduce re-quotes, field changes, and project delays. Note: For potable water applications, third-party certification to NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 is widely required by codes and state/provincial regulations. (nsf.org)

IFW Supply supports buyers across the United States—especially in Boise, Salt Lake City, Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle—who need dependable valve sourcing for waterworks & irrigation, industrial PVF packages, and fire protection builds. When valves are export-bound, correct documentation and spec cross-referencing become as important as the valve itself.

1) Start with the application: waterworks, fire protection, or industrial process

Waterworks & irrigation (municipal / site utility)

Many municipal specs lean on AWWA standards for resilient-seated gate valves (common in distribution systems) and will specify operating ranges, size ranges, and pressure ratings. For example, AWWA C509-23 describes iron-body resilient-seated gate valves for water supply service and includes minimum design working water pressure requirements (commonly 200 psi for smaller sizes and 150 psi for larger sizes) and a velocity intent (not exceeding 16 ft/s when fully open). (store.awwa.org)

If the line carries potable water, confirm NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 certification requirements and any project-specific language around PFAS-related updates (some specifications now call out newer testing expectations and marks). (nsf.org)

Fire protection (system control and isolation)

Fire protection valves must match the system listing/approval requirements and the design intent (isolation, sectional control, test/drain, etc.). When a project requires supervisory switches (common in commercial systems), the valve type and trim package can be just as important as the valve body material. If you’re buying for fire protection, clarify whether you need indicating vs non-indicating, supervised vs non-supervised, and whether the valve must be listed/approved for the system.

Industrial process & PVF packages (plants, energy, food, mining, facilities)

In industrial service, “steel vs stainless” is often a corrosion and temperature story. You’ll typically also need to lock in pressure class, end connections (butt weld, socket weld, threaded, flanged), and any special requirements (oxygen service cleaning, low-temp impact testing, sour service, etc.). For project engineers, the fastest way to avoid submittal resets is to standardize the valve datasheet fields and require vendors to answer them all—no blanks.

2) Steel vs stainless steel: what you’re really deciding

Buyers often frame the decision as “carbon steel vs stainless steel,” but the real decision usually includes: corrosion mechanism, lifecycle maintenance, and failure consequence. Stainless typically costs more up front, but can reduce downtime, repainting/coating needs, and premature replacement in corrosive environments.

Quick comparison (field-practical)

Factor Carbon / alloy steel valves Stainless steel valves
Typical “why” Strength, cost control, broad availability Corrosion resistance, cleanliness, lifecycle durability
Common risks if misapplied External corrosion (atmospheric), internal corrosion with aggressive media Chloride pitting/crevice corrosion in some stainless grades; galling on fasteners if not specified
Best-fit environments Non-corrosive services, indoor mechanical rooms, controlled atmospheres Washdown areas, coastal/chemical atmospheres, corrosive utilities, many food/process spaces
Documentation focus MTRs, pressure class, trim materials, coating/lining specs Exact grade, trim compatibility, seat material, cleaning requirements (if any)

For potable water valves, material choice doesn’t replace certification—specs often still require third-party NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 certification for drinking water contact. (nsf.org)

3) A spec-first checklist (reduces RFIs, re-quotes, and field changes)

Step 1: Define the media and the real operating envelope

Don’t buy valves from a single “design pressure” number. Capture minimum/maximum pressure, operating temperature range, and any transient events (pump starts, fast-acting actuators, emergency shutdowns). If velocity matters (common in waterworks standards), record it—some standards explicitly state intended velocity limits for fully open positions. (store.awwa.org)

Step 2: Lock the governing standard(s) early

For municipal water supply service, AWWA standards such as C509 are commonly referenced for resilient-seated gate valves, including materials, testing, marking, and pressure ratings. (store.awwa.org)

For potable water contact components, confirm whether the project requires NSF/ANSI/CAN 61, and whether the spec calls out newer PFAS-related testing expectations and timelines (some 2024 updates include expanded PFAS criteria and a 2028 compliance deadline for new testing requirements). (nsf.org)

Step 3: Select valve type based on function (not habit)

Isolation, throttling, backflow prevention, and control applications place different demands on seats, stems, and actuation. A gate valve used as a control valve is a common failure pattern; likewise, butterfly valves need correct seat and disc materials for the media and temperature.

Step 4: Specify trim, not just body material

“Stainless valve” can still hide carbon steel fasteners, mismatched stem alloys, or elastomers that won’t tolerate your chemical exposure. Request a full bill of materials (BOM) by component: body, bonnet, stem, disc/ball, seat, packing, bolting, and coating/lining.

Step 5: Confirm end connections and installation constraints

A project can lose days to a single mismatch: flanged drilling standard, face-to-face dimensions, grooved coupling requirements, or weld-end schedules. Add “clearance and service access” notes (handwheel clearance, actuator swing, gearbox access, supervisory switch location).

Step 6: Build your submittal package like an inspector will read it

For waterworks: include standard compliance, pressure rating, test reports, and (if required) NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 documentation. (nsf.org) For export-bound jobs: add country-specific labeling, packing lists, and documentation expectations early so product selection doesn’t get boxed in later.

4) Buying for potable water: why NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 keeps showing up

NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 focuses on health-effects requirements related to chemical contaminants and impurities that can be imparted to drinking water from system components (including valves). It’s commonly referenced by regulations and plumbing codes, which is why it often becomes a non-negotiable line item in municipal and facility specs. (nsf.org)

If your specification language has been updated recently, you may also see references to the 2024 updates that expand PFAS-related testing criteria and include a January 1, 2028 compliance deadline for new testing requirements. (nsf.org)

5) U.S. project reality: lead times, substitutions, and multi-city consistency

For buyers managing projects across multiple U.S. metros, the fastest cost overrun is often inconsistency: one site spec calls for AWWA gate valves, another calls for an industrial class flanged valve, and a third requires potable certifications plus special coatings. A few standard practices help:

Standardize datasheets across Boise, Salt Lake City, Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle projects so procurement doesn’t re-learn valve requirements on every job.

Pre-approve alternates (materials, end connections, trim) with engineering so substitutions don’t stall in review when lead times tighten.

Document potable requirements clearly (NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 where applicable) and keep certificates on file for repeat buys. (nsf.org)

Helpful internal resources from IFW Supply

Explore broader product categories for waterworks, irrigation, and fire protection on the Products page.

For municipal and site utility needs, visit Waterworks and Waterworks & Irrigation.

For fire protection builds and valve-related system components, see Fire Protection and Fire Safety.

If your valves are shipping internationally, review IFW’s capabilities on Export Sales.

CTA: Get a valve quote built around your spec (not a guess)

Send your datasheet, line list, or marked-up plans and we’ll help cross-reference materials, end connections, and any potable or project-standard requirements—plus support packing, documentation, and logistics for export-ready orders.

FAQ: Steel & stainless steel valve sourcing

Do I need NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 for valves in a drinking water system?

Many regulations and plumbing codes require drinking water contact components to be third-party certified to NSF/ANSI/CAN 61. Confirm the project spec and local authority requirements before releasing the PO. (nsf.org)

What’s a common standard for waterworks gate valves?

AWWA C509 is commonly referenced for resilient-seated gate valves in water supply service, including requirements for design, testing, marking, and minimum pressure ratings. (store.awwa.org)

Is stainless always “better” than steel?

Not always. Stainless often improves corrosion performance, but you still need the right grade and compatible trim/elastomers for your media (chlorides and certain chemicals can be tough on some stainless alloys). The best choice is the one that matches the environment, inspection plan, and lifecycle cost.

What details should I include when requesting a quote?

Include: service (media), pressure/temperature range, valve type, size, end connection, material requirements (body/trim), governing standard (AWWA/other), certifications (NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 if potable), actuation (manual/gear/actuated), and any documentation needs (MTRs, export documents).

What changed recently around NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 and PFAS?

The 2024 updates include expanded PFAS-related testing criteria for certain materials and a January 1, 2028 deadline to comply with new testing requirements. If you’re writing specs now, confirm whether your organization is adopting the updated requirements and how vendors will demonstrate compliance. (nsf.org)

Glossary (quick definitions)

NSF/ANSI/CAN 61: A health-effects standard addressing chemical contaminants/impurities that drinking water system components (including valves) may impart to water; commonly required by codes and regulations for potable water contact. (nsf.org)

AWWA C509: An American Water Works Association standard that provides requirements for resilient-seated gate valves used in water supply service (scope includes materials, design, testing, marking, and shipping). (store.awwa.org)

NRS / OS&Y: Common gate valve stem configurations. NRS (non-rising stem) keeps the stem in place; OS&Y (outside screw and yoke) uses an external screw mechanism and a rising stem that provides a visual open/closed indication.

Trim: Internal valve components (often stem, seat, disc/ball, packing) that strongly influence corrosion resistance, wear, and sealing performance.

MTR (Mill Test Report): Material documentation showing chemical/mechanical properties for metal components—often required for critical industrial services and some project QA programs.

Author: client

View All Posts by Author